The Forecast Calls for Pain
Pointless Storm Coverage and Poignant Reports of the Aftermath
The breathtaking, unbearably sad images and stories detailing the human suffering and devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina are a godsend. Those of us who weren't in harm's way need to realize that this kind of tragedy doesn't just happen in far-flung lands as remote from our daily lives as the dark side of the moon. It happens to our countrymen, to people who look like us and speak the same language and share a common history and culture. Not only will this spur us to open our wallets to relief efforts in the South, but it also should foster a much more real sense of what happens when earthquakes and floods and other such disasters strike foreign lands.
As praiseworthy as the media's efforts have been yesterday and today, on Monday you couldn't watch any of the broadcast coverage of the unfolding storm without realizing how inane much of it was. Whereas the reporting of Katrina's aftermath can humanize the destruction, watching grown men and women struggle to talk in the midst of torrential rain and howling winds is pointless. The intended you-are-there immediacy, so compelling when people return to the scenes of destruction and realize just how horrible things are, never materializes during the coverage of the actual hurricane. Instead you're left shaking your head the reporters' foolishness while they tell you, in essence, that it's really raining hard and it's really windy.
Gail Shister ran an interesting piece in yesterday's Inquirer exploring this very issue, while Salon's TV writer, Heather Havrilesky, put aside her usual snark to file a sober report on her viewing of the coverage Sunday and Monday. Would that all journalism be as thoughtful.

